No One Should Be Forced to Conform to the Views of the State

3 days 10 hours ago

Should you have to think twice before posting a protest flyer to your Instagram story? Or feel pressure to delete that bald JD Vance meme that you shared? Now imagine that you could get kicked out of the country—potentially losing your job or education—based on the Trump administration’s dislike of your views on social media. 

That threat to free expression and dissent is happening now, but we won’t let it stand. 

"...they're not just targeting individuals—they're targeting the very idea of freedom itself."

The Electronic Frontier Foundation and co-counsel are representing the United Automobile Workers (UAW), Communications Workers of America (CWA), and American Federation of Teachers (AFT) in a lawsuit against the U.S. State Department and Department of Homeland Security for their viewpoint-based surveillance and suppression of noncitizens’ First Amendment-protected speech online.  The lawsuit asks a federal court to stop the government’s unconstitutional surveillance program, which has silenced citizens and noncitizens alike. It has even hindered unions’ ability to associate with their members. 

"When they spy on, silence, and fire union members for speaking out, they're not just targeting individuals—they're targeting the very idea of freedom itself,” said UAW President Shawn Fain. 

The Trump administration has built this mass surveillance program to monitor the constitutionally protected online speech of noncitizens who are lawfully present in the U.S. The program uses AI and automated technologies to scour social media and other online platforms to identify and punish individuals who express viewpoints the government considers "hostile" to "our culture" and "our civilization".  But make no mistake: no one should be forced to conform to the views of the state. 

The Foundation of Democracy 

Your free expression and privacy are fundamental human rights, and democracy crumbles without them. We have an opportunity to fight back, but we need you.  EFF’s team of lawyers, activists, researchers, and technologists have been on a mission to protect your freedom online since 1990, and we’re just getting started.

Donate and become a member of EFF today. Your support helps protect crucial rights, online and off, for everyone.

Give Today

Related Cases: United Auto Workers v. U.S. Department of State
Lisa Femia

Labor Unions, EFF Sue Trump Administration to Stop Ideological Surveillance of Free Speech Online

3 days 10 hours ago
Viewpoint-based Online Surveillance of Permanent Residents and Visa Holders Violates First Amendment, Lawsuit Argues

NEW YORK—The United Automobile Workers (UAW), Communications Workers of America (CWA), and American Federation of Teachers (AFT) filed a lawsuit today against the Departments of State and Homeland Security for their viewpoint-based surveillance and suppression of protected expression online. The complaint asks a federal court to stop this unconstitutional surveillance program, which has silenced and frightened both citizens and noncitizens, and hampered the ability of the unions to associate with their members and potential members. The case is titled UAW v. State Department.

Since taking power, the Trump administration has created a mass surveillance program to monitor constitutionally protected speech by noncitizens lawfully present in the U.S. Using AI and other automated technologies, the program surveils the social media accounts of visa holders with the goal of identifying and punishing those who express viewpoints the government doesn't like. This has been paired with a public intimidation campaign, silencing not just noncitizens with immigration status, but also the families, coworkers, and friends with whom their lives are integrated.

As detailed in the complaint, when asked in a survey if they had changed their social media activity as a result of the Trump administration's ideological online surveillance program, over 60 percent of responding UAW members and over 30 percent of responding CWA members who were aware of the program said they had. Among noncitizens, these numbers were even higher. Of respondents aware of the program, over 80 percent of UAW members who were not U.S. citizens and over 40 percent of CWA members who were not U.S. citizens said they had changed their activity online.

Individual union members reported refraining from posting, refraining from sharing union content, deleting posts, and deleting entire accounts in response to the ideological online surveillance program. Criticism of the Trump administration or its policies was the most common type of content respondents reported changing their social media activity around. Many members also reported altering their offline union activity in response to the program, including avoiding being publicly identified as part of the unions and reducing their participation in rallies and protests. One member even said they declined to report a wage theft claim due to fears arising from the surveillance program.

Represented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Muslim Advocates (MA), and the Media Freedom & Information Access Clinic (MFIA), the UAW, CWA, and AFT seek to halt the program that affects thousands of their members individually and has harmed the ability of the unions to organize, represent, and recruit members. The lawsuit argues that the viewpoint-based online surveillance program violates the First Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act.

"The Trump administration's use of surveillance to track and intimidate UAW members is a direct assault on the First Amendment—and an attack on every working person in this country," said UAW President Shawn Fain. "When they spy on, silence, and fire union members for speaking out, they're not just targeting individuals—they're targeting the very idea of freedom itself. The right to protest, to organize, to speak without fear—that's the foundation of American democracy. If they can come for UAW members at our worksites, they can come for any one of us tomorrow. And we will not stand by and let that happen."

"Every worker should be alarmed by the Trump administration’s online surveillance program," said CWA President Claude Cummings Jr. "The labor movement is built on our freedoms under the First Amendment to speak and assemble without fear retaliation by the government. The unconstitutional Challenged Surveillance Program threatens those freedoms and explicitly targets those who are critical of the administration and its policies. This policy interferes with CWA members’ ability to express their points of view online and organize to improve their working conditions."

"Free speech is the foundation of democracy in America," said AFT President Randi Weingarten. "The Trump administration has rejected that core constitutional right and now says only speech it agrees with is permitted—and that it will silence those who disagree. This suit exposes the online surveillance tools and other cyber tactics never envisioned by the founders to enforce compliance with the administration’s views. It details the direct harms on both the target of these attacks and the chilling effect on all those we represent and teach."

"Using a variety of AI and automated tools, the government can now conduct viewpoint-based surveillance and analysis on a scale that was never possible with human review alone," said EFF Staff Attorney Lisa Femia. "The scale of this spying is matched by an equally massive chilling effect on free speech."

"The administration is hunting online for an ever-growing list of disfavored viewpoints," said Golnaz Fakhimi, Legal Director of Muslim Advocates. "Its goal is clear: consolidate authoritarian power by crushing dissent, starting with noncitizens, but certainly not ending there. This urgent lawsuit aims to put a stop to this power grab and defend First Amendment freedoms crucial to a pluralistic and democratic society."

"This case goes to the heart of the First Amendment," said Anthony Cosentino, a student in the Media Freedom & Information Access Clinic. "The government can’t go after people for saying things it doesn’t like. The current administration has ignored that principle, developing a vast surveillance apparatus to find and punish people for their constitutionally protected speech. It is an extraordinary abuse of power, creating a climate of fear not seen in this country since the McCarthy era, especially on college campuses. Our laws and Constitution will not allow it."

For the complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/uaw-v-dos-complaint

For more about the litigation: https://eff.org/cases/united-auto-workers-v-us-department-state

Contacts:
Electronic Frontier Foundation: press@eff.org
Muslim Advocates: golnaz@muslimadvocates.org

Hudson Hongo

 【お知らせ】「生成AI問題とディープフェイク」について考えるオンライン勉強会 10月29日(水)19時から21時=出版ネッツ

3 days 12 hours ago
 生成AIの問題は著作権のみにとどまらず、ニセの情報を手軽かつ大量に生み出すことができる点にもある。利便性や産業推進の観点が強調されがちな中、生成AIによるフェイクや嫌がらせで,、公共や人権がおびやかされることはないのか、その現状とこれからについて考え、学ぶ会を開催する。開催:オンライン(Zoom)のみ料金:1,000円( https://peatix.com/event/4599488/view で申し込み)   申込締め切りは、10月28日(火) 17:00 ※出版ネッツ..
JCJ

[B] 本当の温室効果とは(GHE-1対GHE-2)

3 days 14 hours ago
現在の気候変動の原因は、人類が石炭、石油などの化石燃料を大量に燃やして出すCO2 (二酸化炭素、炭酸ガス)の温室効果によるという信仰的、基本的な信念を持つ人々、そしてその影響を受けて、それこそが真実、だからCO2削減に努力しなければと考える人が多数を占めるようになってしまっている。しかし、その温室効果なるものが、本当に現在の温暖化・気候変動の原因なのか、疑問も多数提出されている。(落合栄一郎)
日刊ベリタ

〈たったひとつの言葉で変わった空気〉雨宮処凛

3 days 21 hours ago
 あなたが「日本人ファースト」という言葉を初めて見たのはいつだろう?  その時、どんな思いが込み上げただろう?  そう問うたのは、この言葉をめぐって「排外主義だ」「いやそうではない」という平行線の議論がずーっと続いている […]
admin

『週刊新潮』コラム問題の深層 深沢潮さん「新潮社が差別や人権侵害に向き合わないことに絶望」 

3 days 22 hours ago
 新潮社が発行する『週刊新潮』に掲載されたコラムが外国にルーツを持つ人々への差別にあたるとして、コラムで名指しされた作家の深沢潮さんが同社に謝罪を求めた問題は、深沢さんが出版に関わる同社との契約を解消する結果となった。 […]
admin