令和7年度地方財政審議会(4月8日)議事要旨
令和7年度地方財政審議会(4月11日)議事要旨
令和6年度地方財政審議会(3月14日)議事要旨
令和6年度地方財政審議会(3月14日)議事要旨
令和6年度地方財政審議会(3月21日)議事要旨
【オンライン講演】戦後80年の報道状況と軍事強化の重なり実感 琉球新報の南 彰記者 OJNで語る=須藤春夫(法政大学名誉教授)
丸山市郎・前駐ミャンマー日本大使はロヒンギャへの差別煽動発言を撤回せず
レイバーネットTV(5/28)メディア黒書:新聞「押し紙」問題のヤミ
JVN: Radware Cloud Web Application Firewallにおけるフィルターバイパスの脆弱性
農薬第三専門調査会(第35回)の開催について(非公開)【5月28日開催】
添加物専門調査会(第202回)の開催について【5月26日開催】
【東部労組の学習活動】 第2回「社会主義に向かう労働運動」連続学習会を実施
「女性による女性のための相談会@かながわ」カンパのお願い
杉原浩司:本日(5/20)の参院外交防衛委で山添議員が武器見本市問題を追及!
Please Drone Responsibly: C-UAS Legislation Needs Civil Liberties Safeguards
Today, the Senate Judiciary Committee is holding a hearing titled “Defending Against Drones: Setting Safeguards for Counter Unmanned Aircraft Systems Authorities.” While the government has a legitimate interest in monitoring and mitigating drone threats, it is critical that those powers are narrowly tailored. Robust checks and oversight mechanisms must exist to prevent misuse and to allow ordinary, law-abiding individuals to exercise their rights.
Unfortunately, as we and many other civil society advocates have highlighted, past proposals have not addressed those needs. Congress should produce well-balanced rules that address all these priorities, not grant de facto authority to law enforcement to take down drone flights whenever they want. Ultimately, Congress must decide whether drones will be a technology that mainly serves government agencies and big companies, or whether it might also empower individuals.
To make meaningful progress in stabilizing counter unmanned aerial system (“C-UAS”) authorities and addressing emerging issues, Congress should adopt a more comprehensive approach that considers the full range of risks and implements proper safeguards. Future C-UAS legislation include the following priorities, which are essential to protecting civil liberties and ensuring accountability:
- Strong and explicit safeguards for First Amendment-protected activities
- Ensure transparency and require detailed reporting
- Provide due process and recourse for improper counter-drone activities
- Require C-UAS mitigation to involve least-invasive methods
- Maintain reasonable retention limits on data collection
- Maintain sunset for C-UAS powers as drone uses continue to evolve
Congress can—and should—address public safety concerns without compromising privacy and civil liberties. C-UAS authorities should only be granted with the clear limits outlined above to help ensure that counter-drone authorities are wielded responsibly.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT), Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) shared these concerns with the Committee in a joint Statement For The Record.
アリの一言:減税財源に軍事費削減を主張する政党がない翼賛体制
Tell Congress Not To Weaponize The Treasury Department Against Nonprofits
The House of Representatives just passed a dangerous bill that gives broad and easily abused new powers to the executive branch would allow the Secretary of Treasury to strip a U.S. nonprofit of its tax-exempt status. Nonprofits would not have a meaningful opportunity to defend themselves, and could be targeted without disclosing the reasons or evidence for the decision. Even if they are not targeted, the threat alone could chill the activities of some nonprofit organizations. Over 130 civil liberties, religious, reproductive health, immigrant rights, human rights, racial justice, LGBTQ+, environmental, and educational organizations signed a letter opposing the bill as written. We most tell the Senate not to pass H.R. 9495, the so-called “Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act.”