We Called on the Oversight Board to Stop Censoring “From the River to the Sea” — And They Listened

EFF update
3 months 1 week ago

Earlier this year, the Oversight Board announced a review of three cases involving different pieces of content on Facebook that contained the phrase “From the River to the Sea.” EFF submitted to the consultation urging Meta to make individualized moderation decisions on this content rather than a blanket ban as the phrase can be a historical call for Palestinian liberation and not an incitement of hatred in violation with Meta’s community standards.

We’re happy to see that the Oversight Board agreed. In last week’s decision, the Board found that the three pieces of examined content did not break Meta’s rules on “Hate Speech, Violence and Incitement or Dangerous Organizations and Individuals.” Instead, these uses of the phrase “From the River to the Sea” were found to be an expression of solidarity with Palestinians and not an inherent call for violence, exclusion, or glorification of designated terrorist group Hamas. 

The Oversight Board decision follows Meta’s original action to keep the content online. In each of the three cases, users appealed to Meta to remove the content but the company’s automated tools dismissed the appeals for human review and kept the content on Facebook. Users subsequently appealed to the Board and called for the content to be removed. The material included a comment that used the hashtag #fromtherivertothesea, a video depicting floating watermelon slices forming the phrases “From the River to the Sea” and “Palestine will be free,” and a reshared post declaring support for the Palestinian people.

As we’ve said many times, content moderation at scale does not work. Nowhere is this truer than on Meta services like Facebook and Instagram where the vast amount of material posted has incentivized the corporation to rely on flawed automated decision-making tools and inadequate human review. But this is a rare occasion where Meta’s original decision to carry the content and the Oversight Board’s subsequent decision supporting this upholds our fundamental right to free speech online. 

The tech giant must continue examining content referring to “From the River to the Sea” on an individualized basis, and we continue to call on Meta to recognize its wider responsibilities to the global user base to ensure people are free to express themselves online without biased or undue censorship and discrimination.

Paige Collings

【２０２４年度第67回 JCJ賞】JCJ大賞 しんぶん赤旗日曜版 『自民党派閥パーティー資金の「政治資金報告書不記載」報道と、引き続く政治資金、裏金問題に関する一連のキャンペーン』、 JCJ賞4点。10月5日（土）午後1時から東京・日比谷図書文化館コンベンションホールで贈賞式

日本ジャーナリストクラブ（JCJ）
3 months 1 week ago
　JCJ賞作品は次の通りです。　【JCJ大賞】　　1点● 自民党派閥パーティー資金の「政治資金報告書不記載」報道と、引き続く政治資金、裏金問題に関する一連のキャンペーン　しんぶん赤旗日曜版　　　　　　　　　【JCJ賞】　　　4点　　　（順不同）●　上丸洋一（じょうまる・よういち）『南京事件と新聞報道　記者たちは何を書き、何を書かなかったか』　朝日新聞出版●　後藤秀典（ごとう・ひでのり）　『東京電力の変節　最高裁・司法エリートとの癒着と原発被災者攻撃』　旬報社●　NHKスペシャ..
ＪＣＪ

Marruecos solo acepta el 8% de las expulsiones de sus nacionales emitidas por la UE

Statewatch
3 months 1 week ago

"La eterna ambición de la Unión Europea y las promesas de sus líderes —y de la oposición— de devolver cada vez más inmigrantes en situación irregular se da de bruces con la realidad de sus propios datos. Un informe restringido de la Comisión Europea, publicado por la organización Statewatch, analiza al detalle la cooperación en materia de expulsiones de 34 países, y la conclusión es que la colaboración es “insuficiente”."

Full story here (paywall).

Statewatch