第6回 支払手段の多様化と消費者問題に関する専門調査会【6月12日開催】
農薬第一専門調査会(第38回)の開催について(非公開)【6月16日開催】
薬剤耐性菌に関するワーキンググループ(第58回)の開催について【6月13日開催】
企画等専門調査会(第45回)の開催について【6月12日開催】
食品安全委員会(第986回)の開催について【6月10日開催】
パリの窓から : 「自由の船」ーパレスチナ人民のジェノサイドを止めよ
グレタ・トゥンベリさんら支援船でガザへ出発:非暴力の直接行動
韓国オプティカル争議 : 日東電工社長、話し合い求めたら「面談強要」として提訴
日本学術会議「特殊法人化」法案を廃案にするために、一人でもできること
JVN: 三菱電機製 FA エンジニアリングソフトウェア製品における複数の脆弱性
Weekly Report: IPAが「2024年度中小企業における情報セキュリティ対策に関する実態調査報告書」を公表
The role of digitalisation in collective action to end plastic pollution
Statement on California State Senate Advancing Dangerous Surveillance Bill
In the wake of the California State Senate’s passage of S.B. 690, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), TechEquity, Consumer Federation of California, Tech Oversight California, ACLU California Action, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, and the California Low Income Consumers Coalition issued a joint statement warning that the bill would put the safety and privacy of millions of Californians at serious risk:
“SB 690 gives the green-light to dystopian big tech surveillance practices which will endanger the privacy and safety of all Californians. SB 690 would allow companies to spy on us to get our sensitive personal information, such as our immigration status or what healthcare we’ve received. And once they have our sensitive personal information, SB 690 places no limits on how that business can use or share that information, allowing them to share it with data brokers, immigration officials, or law enforcement officials in states that restrict reproductive or gender-affirming care.
“At a time where agencies of the federal government are actively targeting individuals based on information collected from businesses about their political beliefs, religious affiliations, or health decisions, we cannot risk sharing even more sensitive information with them. The legislature should be doing all it can to protect Californians, not make it easier for the federal government to secretly obtain our sensitive information.”
Update: This post has been updated to reflect additional signers.
Background