瓢箪通信「朝日の社説に茶々を入れるーー再び」
Biden Signed the TikTok Ban. What's Next for TikTok Users?
Over the last month, lawmakers moved swiftly to pass legislation that would effectively ban TikTok in the United States, eventually including it in a foreign aid package that was signed by President Biden. The impact of this legislation isn’t entirely clear yet, but what is clear: whether TikTok is banned or sold to new owners, millions of people in the U.S. will no longer be able to get information and communicate with each other as they presently do.
What Happens Next?At the moment, TikTok isn’t “banned.” The law gives ByteDance 270 days to divest TikTok before the ban would take effect, which would be on January 19th, 2025. In the meantime, we expect courts to determine that the bill is unconstitutional. Though there is no lawsuit yet, one on behalf of TikTok itself is imminent.
There are three possible outcomes. If the law is struck down, as it should be, nothing will change. If ByteDance divests TikTok by selling it, then the platform would still likely be usable. However, there’s no telling whether the app’s new owners would change its functionality, its algorithms, or other aspects of the company. As we’ve seen with other platforms, a change in ownership can result in significant changes that could impact its audience in unexpected ways. In fact, that’s one of the given reasons to force the sale: so TikTok will serve different content to users, specifically when it comes to Chinese propaganda and misinformation. This is despite the fact that it has been well-established law for almost 60 years that U.S. people have a First Amendment right to receive foreign propaganda.
Lastly, if ByteDance refuses to sell, users in the U.S. will likely see it disappear from app stores sometime between now and that January 19, 2025 deadline.
How Will the Ban Be Implemented?The law limits liability to intermediaries—entities that “provide services to distribute, maintain, or update” TikTok by means of a marketplace, or that provide internet hosting services to enable the app’s distribution, maintenance, or updating. The law also makes intermediaries responsible for its implementation.
The law explicitly denies to the Attorney General the authority to enforce it against an individual user of a foreign adversary controlled application, so users themselves cannot be held liable for continuing to use the application, if they can access it.
Will I Be Able to Download or Use TikTok If ByteDance Doesn’t Sell?It’s possible some U.S. users will find routes around the ban. But the vast majority will probably not, significantly shifting the platform's user base and content. If ByteDance itself assists in the distribution of the app, it could also be found liable, so even if U.S. users continue to use the platform, the company’s ability to moderate and operate the app in the U.S. would likely be impacted. Bottom line: for a period of time after January 19, it’s possible that the app would be usable, but it’s unlikely to be the same platform—or even a very functional one in the U.S.—for very long.
Until now, the United States has championed the free flow of information around the world as a fundamental democratic principle and called out other nations when they have shut down internet access or banned social media apps and other online communications tools. In doing so, the U.S. has deemed restrictions on the free flow of information to be undemocratic. Enacting this legislation has undermined this long standing, democratic principle. It has also undermined the U.S. government’s moral authority to call out other nations for when they shut down internet access or ban social media apps and other online communications tools.
There are a few reasons legislators have given to ban TikTok. One is to change the type of content on the app—a clear First Amendment violation. The second is to protect data privacy. Our lawmakers should work to protect data privacy, but this was the wrong approach. They should prevent any company—regardless of where it is based—from collecting massive amounts of our detailed personal data, which is then made available to data brokers, U.S. government agencies, and even foreign adversaries. They should solve the real problem of out-of-control privacy invasions by enacting comprehensive consumer data privacy legislation. Instead, as happens far too often, our government’s actions are vastly overreaching while also deeply underserving the public.
[B] 食料・農業・農村基本法改定の意味を問う(下) 食料版”新しい戦前”か
APC at CSW68: Questioning power structures and advocating for women’s rights
Common Room joins the APC network: "Community network development for marginalised communities requires a long-term process"
BNNRC joins the APC network: “We have maintained a strong and strategic relationship with APC for over 23 years”
【出版トピックス】書店ゼロ27%に増える ネット販売規制は短絡的、「読書マインド」の育成が先決=橋詰雅博
[B] 労働運動にストライキ権 働く者の尊厳を取り戻す時、そごう・西武労組のストが教えること 東海林智
レイバーネット川柳句会報告 「独裁も和風洋風中華風」
OurPlanet-TV : 入管問題を風化させない〜全国一斉デモ
レイバーブッククラブ読書会案内『ルポ 低賃金』
ご案内 : 香港の調査報道記者とのフェミニズムジャーナリスト交流会/松元ちえさん出演
農薬第二専門調査会(第32回)の開催について(非公開)【5月13日開催】
農薬第二専門調査会(第31回)の開催について【5月13日開催】
韓国労働ニュース4月後半号:「労働組合」は「市民・社会団体」の一つ
消費動向調査(令和6年4月実施分)
Free Gaza グラフィティ弾圧・再逮捕糾弾! 緊急抗議声明
東京東部労組:イスラエル大使館前で「反戦メーデー」を実施!
Bangladesh NGOs Network for Radio and Communication joins the APC network: “We have maintained a strong and strategic relationship with APC for over 23 years”
Meet Bangladesh NGOs Network for Radio and Communication (BNNRC), a Bangladesh-based organisation focused on media development and building the capacity of civil society organisations on digital transformation.
Language English