「第23回市場公募地方債発行団体合同IR」の開催
IPネットワーク設備委員会 報告(案)に対する意見募集
令和6年度都道府県議会議員及び市区町村議会議員総務大臣感謝状贈呈式
電波法施行規則の一部を改正する省令案等に対する意見募集
情報通信審議会 情報通信技術分科会 陸上無線通信委員会 基幹系無線システム作業班(第1回)
「放送コンテンツの製作取引適正化に関するガイドライン」改訂案 (第8版(案))に対する意見募集の結果及び改訂版(第8版)の公表
情報通信審議会 情報通信技術分科会 技術戦略委員会(第50回)開催案内
新たな周波数割当計画案に係る意見募集の結果 及び電波監理審議会からの答申
第210回統計委員会
経済安全保障ワーキンググループ(第5回)配布資料・議事概要
2020年基準 消費者物価指数 全国 2024年(令和6年)9月分
情報通信法学研究会(令和6年度)
ガザ虐殺の武器はいらない!/「国際航空宇宙展」前で抗議のダイイン
【JCJオンライン講演会】「カザフスタンの核被害と日本」講師:小山 美砂さん(ジャーナリスト、『「黒い雨」訴訟』集英社新書 23年度JCJ賞受賞)10月26日(土)午後2時から4時
Prosecutors in Washington State Warn Police: Don’t Use Gen AI to Write Reports
The King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, which handles all prosecutions in the Seattle area, has instructed police in no uncertain terms: do not use AI to write police reports...for now. This is a good development. We hope prosecutors across the country will exercise such caution as companies continue to peddle technology – generative artificial intelligence (genAI) to help write police reports – that could harm people who come into contact with the criminal justice system.
Chief Deputy Prosecutor Daniel J. Clark said in a memo about AI-based tools to write narrative police reports based on body camera audio that the technology as it exists is “one we are not ready to accept.”
The memo continues,“We do not fear advances in technology – but we do have legitimate concerns about some of the products on the market now... AI continues to develop and we are hopeful that we will reach a point in the near future where these reports can be relied on. For now, our office has made the decision not to accept any police narratives that were produced with the assistance of AI.” We would add that, while EFF embraces advances in technology, we doubt genAI in the near future will be able to help police write reliable reports.
We agree with Chief Deputy Clark that: “While an officer is required to edit the narrative and assert under penalty of perjury that it is accurate, some of the [genAI] errors are so small that they will be missed in review.”
This is a well-reasoned and cautious approach. Some police want to cut the time they spend writing reports, and Axon’s new product DraftOne claims to do so by exporting the labor to machines. But the public, and other local agencies, should be skeptical of this tech. After all, these documents are often essential for prosecutors to build their case, for district attorneys to recommend charges, and for defenders to cross examine arresting officers.
To read more on generative AI and police reports, click here.