Aggregator | JCA-NET

NEW YORK–In a victory for personal privacy, a New York federal district court judge today granted a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit challenging the U.S. Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM) disclosure of records to DOGE and its agents.

Judge Denise L. Cote of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York found that OPM violated the Privacy Act and bypassed its established cybersecurity practices under the Administrative Procedures Act. The court will decide the scope of the injunction later this week. The plaintiffs have asked the court to halt DOGE agents’ access to OPM records and for DOGE and its agents to delete any records that have already been disclosed. OPM’s databases hold highly sensitive personal information about tens of millions of federal employees, retirees, and job applicants.

“The plaintiffs have shown that the defendants disclosed OPM records to individuals who had no legal right of access to those records,” Cote found. “In doing so, the defendants violated the Privacy Act and departed from cybersecurity standards that they are obligated to follow. This was a breach of law and of trust. Tens of millions of Americans depend on the Government to safeguard records that reveal their most private and sensitive affairs.”

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Lex Lumina LLP, Democracy Defenders Fund, and The Chandra Law Firm requested the injunction as part of their ongoing lawsuit against OPM and DOGE on behalf of two labor unions and individual current and former government workers across the country. The lawsuit’s union plaintiffs are the American Federation of Government Employees AFL-CIO and the Association of Administrative Law Judges, International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers Judicial Council 1 AFL-CIO.

The lawsuit argues that OPM and OPM Acting Director Charles Ezell illegally disclosed personnel records to DOGE agents in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act and the federal Privacy Act of 1974, a watershed anti-surveillance statute that prevents the federal government from abusing our personal information. In addition to seeking to permanently halt the disclosure of further OPM data to DOGE, the lawsuit asks for the deletion of any data previously disclosed by OPM to DOGE.

The federal government is the nation’s largest employer, and the records held by OPM represent one of the largest collections of sensitive personal data in the country. In addition to personally identifiable information such as names, social security numbers, and demographic data, these records include work information like salaries and union activities; personal health records and information regarding life insurance and health benefits; financial information like death benefit designations and savings programs; nondisclosure agreements; and information concerning family members and other third parties referenced in background checks and health records.

OPM holds these records for tens of millions of Americans, including current and former federal workers and those who have applied for federal jobs. OPM has a history of privacy violations—an OPM breach in 2015 exposed the personal information of 22.1 million people—and its recent actions make its systems less secure.

With few exceptions, the Privacy Act limits the disclosure of federally maintained sensitive records on individuals without the consent of the individuals whose data is being shared. It protects all Americans from harms caused by government stockpiling of our personal data. This law was enacted in 1974, the last time Congress acted to limit the data collection and surveillance powers of an out-of-control President.

A number of courts have already found that DOGE’s activities at other agencies likely violate the law, including at the Social Security Administration and the Treasury Department.

For the preliminary injunction: https://www.eff.org/document/afge-v-opm-opinion-and-order-granting-preliminary-injunction
For the complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/afge-v-opm-complaint
For more about the case: https://www.eff.org/cases/american-federation-government-employees-v-us-office-personnel-management

Contacts:
Electronic Frontier Foundation: press@eff.org
Lex Lumina LLP: Managing Partner Rhett Millsaps, rhett@lex-lumina.com

Hudson Hongo

[B] 差別やデマを助長する恐れのある「不法滞在者ゼロプラン」　市民有志がプランの再考を求める意見書を公表

日刊ベリタ

1 week 6 days ago

政府は先月、国内の不法滞在者ゼロを目指す「不法滞在者ゼロプラン」を発表。鈴木法相は記者会見で「ルールを守る外国人を積極的に受け入れる一方で、守らない外国人は速やかに国外退去させる。将来的には不法滞在者ゼロをしっかりと目指していく」と語った。ところが、政府が示す「ルール」の線引きは曖昧なものであり、「政府の裁量次第で本来保護されるべき難民が国外退去の対象になるのでは」といった懸念の声も聞かれる。（藤ヶ谷魁）

日刊ベリタ

【横浜市再開発】「旧庁舎、不当な安値」本人訴訟の原告招き例会＝神奈川支部

日本ジャーナリストクラブ（JCJ）

1 week 6 days ago

　歴史的な名建築の旧市庁舎を一部取り壊し、超高層ビルを建設する横浜市の再開発事業を不当とする訴えが市民から起こされている。ＪＣＪ神奈川支部は、４月２６日横浜市内で例会を開き、「横浜市民の財産を守る会」の高田尚暢代表に話を聞いた。　２０２０年６月に竣工した横浜市の新市庁舎は、高さ１５５ｍ、３２階の高層ビル。林文子前市長時代の２０１３年にそれまでの市庁舎から移転することが決定された。庁舎建設の傑作　横浜スタジアムに隣接し、JR関内駅前という好立地にある旧市庁舎は１９５９年に建てら..

ＪＣＪ